<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pullman Needs a New Compass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/</link>
	<description>In Search of the Pool of Siloam</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jason b</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>jason b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Indeed, 'tis a common theme in certain parts of these circles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, &#8217;tis a common theme in certain parts of these circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-154</guid>
		<description>My bad, then, Jason. Every other Christian blog I've read this week says something like that. I just assumed that was what you were implying. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad, then, Jason. Every other Christian blog I&#8217;ve read this week says something like that. I just assumed that was what you were implying. <img src='http://mudshoteyes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason b</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>jason b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Jon, it appears that you have mistakenly taken my statement that "I refuse to give the guy a dime for his movie or novels" to mean that I was "advocating boycotting something."  I think you have taken my point to mean more than it does.

The sentence actually means that I am not going to see the movies or read the books (though Tage's competent recommendation was near convincing).  I don't advocate boycotts.  They are useless and wrong-headed, in my opinion (which you are welcome to disagree with, by the way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, it appears that you have mistakenly taken my statement that &#8220;I refuse to give the guy a dime for his movie or novels&#8221; to mean that I was &#8220;advocating boycotting something.&#8221;  I think you have taken my point to mean more than it does.</p>
<p>The sentence actually means that I am not going to see the movies or read the books (though Tage&#8217;s competent recommendation was near convincing).  I don&#8217;t advocate boycotts.  They are useless and wrong-headed, in my opinion (which you are welcome to disagree with, by the way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason b</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>jason b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tage, for your comment.  Well said.

I don't share your opinion that Tolkien was a good linguist, but not a good novelist.  But it may be because my enjoyment of the books is directly tied to his brilliant use of language (and the story, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tage, for your comment.  Well said.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t share your opinion that Tolkien was a good linguist, but not a good novelist.  But it may be because my enjoyment of the books is directly tied to his brilliant use of language (and the story, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-145</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Umm, yes… So let me get this straight: we should eliminate any postings which are a response to a person’s opinion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, because obviously I was the one advocating boycotting something because that something's author said something I disagreed with.

*Cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Umm, yes… So let me get this straight: we should eliminate any postings which are a response to a person’s opinion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, because obviously I was the one advocating boycotting something because that something&#8217;s author said something I disagreed with.</p>
<p>*Cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tage</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Before you write off The Golden Compass, have you looked closely at Pullman's actual opinions?

I'm a big fan of LotR and a fair admirer of the Chronicles of Narnia, but I can see Pullman's points... Is he a little brashly vocal? Perhaps. Could he be more diplomatic? Certainly.

But Tolkein is longwinded, and concerned largely with things that were cool to him. It's an awesome story idea wrapped inside a lot of self-indulgence in writing. But the guy was a linguist, not a novelist. Doesn't mean I don't love the story, but my love doesn't prevent it from being bad novel writing.

And Lewis -- he promotes Christian ideals: there's lots of good story but it ends, basically, with the idea life on earth is less important than the afterlife. Someone (Susan) who values worldly things has in-point-of-fact rendered themselves incapable of wanting to go to heaven. That's kind of a lot to swallow; is it any surprise that someone with Pullman's views would find it offensive?

I'm of course not saying don't avoid Pullman if you disagree with his views, or if you feel that he denigrates your beliefs. However, if the only thing you dislike is his dislike of other authors, check out the first book. It's quite good. The second one is decent as well. The third is rather meh, but you end up reading just finish things off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you write off The Golden Compass, have you looked closely at Pullman&#8217;s actual opinions?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of LotR and a fair admirer of the Chronicles of Narnia, but I can see Pullman&#8217;s points&#8230; Is he a little brashly vocal? Perhaps. Could he be more diplomatic? Certainly.</p>
<p>But Tolkein is longwinded, and concerned largely with things that were cool to him. It&#8217;s an awesome story idea wrapped inside a lot of self-indulgence in writing. But the guy was a linguist, not a novelist. Doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t love the story, but my love doesn&#8217;t prevent it from being bad novel writing.</p>
<p>And Lewis &#8212; he promotes Christian ideals: there&#8217;s lots of good story but it ends, basically, with the idea life on earth is less important than the afterlife. Someone (Susan) who values worldly things has in-point-of-fact rendered themselves incapable of wanting to go to heaven. That&#8217;s kind of a lot to swallow; is it any surprise that someone with Pullman&#8217;s views would find it offensive?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m of course not saying don&#8217;t avoid Pullman if you disagree with his views, or if you feel that he denigrates your beliefs. However, if the only thing you dislike is his dislike of other authors, check out the first book. It&#8217;s quite good. The second one is decent as well. The third is rather meh, but you end up reading just finish things off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason b</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>jason b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Umm, yes...  So let me get this straight:  we should eliminate any postings which are a response to a person's opinion.

NEWSFLASH:  90% of all blogging has been permanently halted by "Jon."  More at 11 after our story about people having opinions.

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, yes&#8230;  So let me get this straight:  we should eliminate any postings which are a response to a person&#8217;s opinion.</p>
<p>NEWSFLASH:  90% of all blogging has been permanently halted by &#8220;Jon.&#8221;  More at 11 after our story about people having opinions.<br />
 <img src='http://mudshoteyes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-152</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My concern is Pullman’s blind arrogance in calling LOTR a lesser work than his own.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Newsflash: people have opinions. More at 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My concern is Pullman’s blind arrogance in calling LOTR a lesser work than his own.</p></blockquote>
<p>Newsflash: people have opinions. More at 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason b</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>jason b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jon, for the question.  That's definitely not my point here.  My concern is Pullman's blind arrogance in calling LOTR a lesser work than his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jon, for the question.  That&#8217;s definitely not my point here.  My concern is Pullman&#8217;s blind arrogance in calling LOTR a lesser work than his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 06:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I hope you're not suggesting what I think you're suggesting about Tolkien, that Lord of the Rings is some kind of Christian allegory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re not suggesting what I think you&#8217;re suggesting about Tolkien, that Lord of the Rings is some kind of Christian allegory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Golden Compass &#171; The Christ Follower Blog</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>The Golden Compass &#171; The Christ Follower Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting critique of this film.  Fellow blogger Jason Barmer, at the Mudshot Eyes blog, has also written a very good post about the author of the book and his flippant dismissals of the literary works of CS Lewis and JRR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting critique of this film.  Fellow blogger Jason Barmer, at the Mudshot Eyes blog, has also written a very good post about the author of the book and his flippant dismissals of the literary works of CS Lewis and JRR [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christfollower</title>
		<link>http://mudshoteyes.com/2007/12/02/pullman-needs-a-new-compass/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>christfollower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudshoteyes.com/?p=176#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Excellent critique!  I've heard of the hoopla revolving around this film and I hope that it doesn't increase the box office take.  The recent spate of anti-war films have all flopped; so there is hope that this film will also suffer at the box office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent critique!  I&#8217;ve heard of the hoopla revolving around this film and I hope that it doesn&#8217;t increase the box office take.  The recent spate of anti-war films have all flopped; so there is hope that this film will also suffer at the box office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
